<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why public confidence in Obama administration ability to protect us from terrorist attacks is so low?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/</link>
	<description>President Barack Obama Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caps onside</title>
		<link>http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Caps onside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>because the Administration want to return our nations security to one controlled by lawyers...when they only use the law to enhance their own power and ignore most of the ones we have already on the books</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because the Administration want to return our nations security to one controlled by lawyers&#8230;when they only use the law to enhance their own power and ignore most of the ones we have already on the books</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seldon Surak</title>
		<link>http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>Seldon Surak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>first it was a 747

second, it wasn&#039;t Obama&#039;s, it is the Air Force&#039;s

third, Obama was in the Oval office, not on the plane

fourth, he left teethmarks in the backside of  the person responsible

fifth the people who overreacted, suffer from post traumatic stress disorder and HOW DARE YOU TRY TO USE IT TO SCORE POLITICAL POINTS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first it was a 747</p>
<p>second, it wasn&#8217;t <a href="http://obamapresidencynews.com">Obama</a>&#8216;s, it is the Air Force&#8217;s</p>
<p>third, Obama was in the Oval office, not on the plane</p>
<p>fourth, he left teethmarks in the backside of  the person responsible</p>
<p>fifth the people who overreacted, suffer from post traumatic stress disorder and HOW DARE YOU TRY TO USE IT TO SCORE POLITICAL POINTS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary B</title>
		<link>http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>Hell yeah, seldon.
Lay down the freakin&#039; law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell yeah, seldon.<br />
Lay down the freakin&#8217; law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Willard</title>
		<link>http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Willard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1590</guid>
		<description>I feel safer now than I have since 911. This whole Air Force 1 thing is much ado about nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel safer now than I have since 911. This whole Air Force 1 thing is much ado about nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's That Guy</title>
		<link>http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>It's That Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>Actually the American people as a whole answer polls over and over that they now trust the Democrats more than the Republicans on national security.  This represents a huge change, since the Republicans -owned- the national security issue since Nixon&#039;s time.  I think it shows just how badly GW Bush has damaged the GOP&#039;s image.

But the govt. should have released news ahead of time that there would be airplanes flying low, circling the Statue of Liberty.  That was a mistake.  It&#039;s strange that Obama should be blamed for that, since he was obviously out of the loop, he apologized and promised it wouldn&#039;t happen again.  I think it just shows how right wing media is grasping at straws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the American people as a whole answer polls over and over that they now trust the Democrats more than the Republicans on national security.  This represents a huge change, since the Republicans -owned- the national security issue since Nixon&#8217;s time.  I think it shows just how badly GW Bush has damaged the GOP&#8217;s image.</p>
<p>But the govt. should have released news ahead of time that there would be airplanes flying low, circling the Statue of Liberty.  That was a mistake.  It&#8217;s strange that <a href="http://obamapresidencynews.com">Obama</a> should be blamed for that, since he was obviously out of the loop, he apologized and promised it wouldn&#8217;t happen again.  I think it just shows how right wing media is grasping at straws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tribeca_belle</title>
		<link>http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1592</link>
		<dc:creator>tribeca_belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1592</guid>
		<description>Where are you getting your information on public confidence? Obviously if a low-flying jet is flying over Manhattan it would cause consternation but if you are trying to translate that into low confidence about the Obama administration&#039;s ability to protect us, then you are evidently just making things up.

Ask New Yorkers whether they trust Obama more than Bush to protect them.  The answer would clearly be, yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are you getting your information on public confidence? Obviously if a low-flying jet is flying over Manhattan it would cause consternation but if you are trying to translate that into low confidence about the <a href="http://obamapresidencynews.com">Obama</a> administration&#8217;s ability to protect us, then you are evidently just making things up.</p>
<p>Ask New Yorkers whether they trust Obama more than Bush to protect them.  The answer would clearly be, yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barometer Soup</title>
		<link>http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>Barometer Soup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://obamapresidencynews.com/2010/why-public-confidence-in-obama-administration-ability-to-protect-us-from-terrorist-attacks-is-so-low/#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>Did you bump your head and break your logic circuits?

It wouldn&#039;t have mattered if Bush, McCain, or Abe Lincoln was in the oval office - a low flying jumbo jet chased by F-16s in NYC is bound to cause alarm.  And, it is just plain silly to think that citizens would have felt better knowing that their President was willing to blow the 767 to pieces over their city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you bump your head and break your logic circuits?</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t have mattered if Bush, McCain, or Abe Lincoln was in the oval office &#8211; a low flying jumbo jet chased by F-16s in NYC is bound to cause alarm.  And, it is just plain silly to think that citizens would have felt better knowing that their President was willing to blow the 767 to pieces over their city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: obamapresidencynews.com @ 2012-02-12 07:36:26 -->
